On May 1, 2014, the California Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that state consumer protection laws do not provide recourse to customers on excess sales tax reimbursements. See Loeffler v. Target Corp., Cal. Sup. Ct. No S173972 (5/1/14). The issue at hand was whether customers could challenge sales tax determinations made by a retailer in Court based on state consumer protection laws, in particular the California Unfair Competition Law ("CUCL") and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"). The California Supreme Court affirmed a lower Court decision that only the retailer has recourse to seek a determination as to whether a particular transaction is subject to California sales tax if sales tax was collected and remitted to the State.

POST WRITTEN BY

Founded in 1953, Green Hasson Janks is a Los Angeles-based accounting firm that specializes in nonprofit, food and beverage, entertainment and media and health and wellness companies. Recipient of the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce 2018 Employee Champion For Life Work Harmony Award and named a…Learn More